In a development that has drawn attention from media circles, former CBS News anchor Josh Elliott has filed for divorce from his wife of nearly a decade, New York City journalist Liz Cho. The couple, both prominent figures in broadcast news, announced their separation through court documents, with Elliott initiating the proceedings in June 2025. According to documents obtained by Page Six, the filing cites that “the marriage of the parties has broken down irretrievably.” Cho responded in November 2025 using nearly identical language, stating in her court response that their relationship had “broken down irretrievably.”
The split, first publicly reported by Page Six in March 2026, comes just months shy of what would have been the couple's 10th wedding anniversary. Elliott and Cho, who met while working at ABC News, began dating in 2012 and shared a two-year courtship before Elliott proposed in August 2014. Their wedding took place the following year, in July 2015, in a ceremony held in California. The event marked a union of two established journalists, each bringing children from previous marriages into their blended family. Elliott was previously married to Priya Narang, with whom he shares a daughter named Sarina. Cho, for her part, divorced her ex-husband Evan Gottlieb in 2012; they have a daughter, Louisa, born in 2007.
Details surrounding the reasons for the divorce remain sparse, as neither Elliott nor Cho has issued public statements on the matter. Representatives for both have not responded to requests for comment from Us Weekly. However, court filings have revealed some contentious elements in the proceedings. In her November 2025 response, Cho requested extensive documentation, including “all correspondence between [Elliott] and any person, other than the defendant, with whom [Elliott] have or have had a romantic and/or sexual relationship, from July 11, 2015 to the present.” She also sought monthly checking account statements and records of Elliott's travel history dating back to January 2020, according to reports from Page Six.
Elliott has pushed back against these demands, arguing in court documents that they are “unreasonable, unnecessary, harassing and not likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” A source familiar with the case, speaking to Page Six, described Cho's requests as “standard” in divorce proceedings of this nature, adding that there has been no evidence presented suggesting Elliott was unfaithful. The source emphasized that such inquiries are common when seeking to establish the full scope of marital assets and activities, without implying wrongdoing on either side.
In his initial June 2025 filing, Elliott sought a straightforward “dissolution of the marriage,” along with “an equitable distribution of all property, both real and personal.” This request aligns with New York state laws on divorce, where Connecticut residents like the couple— who share a home in the state—often file under similar equitable distribution principles. The couple's marital residence in Connecticut has become a focal point of contention. Following the filing, it appeared that Elliott and Cho were still cohabiting in the home, but that changed amid allegations of unauthorized removals of personal items.
In January 2026 court documents, Cho alleged that Elliott arranged for a moving truck to arrive at their Connecticut home while she was out of town. According to her filing, obtained by Page Six, Elliott removed a “significant amount of furniture and furnishings from the marital residence,” as well as their two dogs. Additionally, Cho claimed that a valuable watch and a pair of earrings had been taken, asserting that Elliott was in possession of the jewelry. Elliott has denied having the items, per the documents. Us Weekly has reached out to both parties' teams for clarification, but no further details have been provided.
The ongoing dispute over household items underscores the acrimonious tone of the divorce, which has unfolded over several months in the courts. A hearing is scheduled for March 20, 2026, where these matters, including property division and the requests for financial and personal records, are expected to be addressed. Legal experts not involved in the case have noted that such hearings often serve to narrow down discovery disputes before proceeding to settlement negotiations or trial.
Elliott and Cho's professional lives have long intersected with high-profile media environments, providing context for their high-visibility union. Elliott, 54, rose to prominence as a sports anchor at ESPN before transitioning to general news at ABC's Good Morning America. His career took a notable turn in 2014 when he joined CBS News as the lead anchor for CBSN, the network's digital streaming service. However, his tenure there ended abruptly in February 2017 under controversial circumstances.
During a live broadcast, Elliott hinted at potential changes in his role, saying, “Although knowing how things work around here, I may see you again on Monday morning. It has been by any measure a great stay here at CBSN.” That same day, CBS News issued a statement announcing that “CBS News and Josh Elliott are parting ways. Josh will no longer be reporting for CBS News. We are grateful for his contributions over the last year, and we wish him the very best in his future endeavors.” Reports at the time suggested Elliott's on-air comment alluded to a larger role that never materialized, leading to his dismissal.
Since leaving CBS, Elliott has maintained a lower profile in broadcasting, occasionally contributing to various outlets but largely stepping back from the spotlight. Cho, 54, has continued her career more steadily, serving as an anchor for ABC News based in New York City. Her work has included coverage of major national stories, and she has been a fixture on the network's morning and evening programs. The couple's shared background in competitive newsrooms likely fostered their initial connection, but sources close to the situation have not elaborated on whether professional pressures contributed to the marital breakdown.
The divorce proceedings come at a time when celebrity splits have been a recurring theme in entertainment news. In 2026 alone, several high-profile separations have made headlines, from musicians to actors, highlighting broader trends in long-term marriages under public scrutiny. For Elliott and Cho, whose relationship was once celebrated as a successful blending of media families, the end of their marriage represents a personal chapter closing amid legal battles over assets accumulated during their decade together.
Financial details of the couple's estate have not been disclosed, but given their careers in journalism, it is reasonable to infer a comfortable lifestyle supported by salaries in the six figures. Connecticut's no-fault divorce laws, which both parties appear to be invoking through the “irretrievable breakdown” language, allow for splits without assigning blame, though the discovery requests suggest Cho's side is probing for a fuller picture of marital finances and fidelity.
As the March 20 hearing approaches, observers in the media world are watching to see if a settlement can be reached out of court, avoiding further public airing of private matters. Neither party has indicated a willingness to reconcile, and with children from prior relationships involved—though not directly in the current proceedings—the focus remains on equitable resolutions. Elliott's past experience with abrupt career shifts may inform his approach to this personal transition, while Cho continues her professional commitments undeterred.
The story of Elliott and Cho's divorce serves as a reminder of the challenges faced by public figures in navigating personal upheavals. While the specifics of their split are guarded, the court documents paint a picture of a once-solid partnership unraveling through standard yet pointed legal maneuvers. As more details emerge from the upcoming hearing, the media landscape that brought them together may once again document their paths diverging.
In the broader context of journalism, where work-life balance can be elusive, the couple's situation echoes stories of other media personalities who have faced similar trials. For now, the emphasis in reporting remains on the facts as presented in official filings, with both Elliott and Cho maintaining silence outside the courtroom.