The Appleton Times

Truth. Honesty. Innovation.

Politics

Marco Rubio warns Iran wanted to be the 'next North Korea' as he sees 'finish line' in conflict

By Jessica Williams

about 18 hours ago

Share:
Marco Rubio warns Iran wanted to be the 'next North Korea' as he sees 'finish line' in conflict

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that the conflict with Iran is nearing its end under Operation Epic Fury, warning that Tehran sought to become a nuclear-armed threat like North Korea. He highlighted progress in private talks while criticizing Iranian deception and questioning NATO's value amid allied reluctance to assist.

WASHINGTON — U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated on Tuesday that the United States is approaching the 'finish line' in its ongoing conflict with Iran, while cautioning that Tehran had ambitions to evolve into the 'next North Korea' with intercontinental missiles capable of reaching American soil.

Rubio made these remarks during an appearance on Fox News' 'Hannity,' where he outlined the Trump administration's rationale for initiating military action against Iran. The conflict, now in its 33rd day under Operation Epic Fury, began with U.S. strikes on Iranian targets on Saturday, February 28, 2026, as confirmed by President Donald Trump. Rubio emphasized that without these decisive steps, Iran would have advanced its ballistic missile program unchecked.

'They were aiming to become the next North Korea, except not a North Korea run by a regime that is troublesome and hard to understand, but an Iran run by radical Shia clerics with intercontinental missiles that could reach the mainland of the United States eventually,' Rubio said. He accused Iranian officials of downplaying their missile capabilities, pointing to Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi's recent public denials. 'This guy is a liar,' Rubio told host Sean Hannity. 'This guy was on television like a week ago – two weeks ago – denying that Iran had any missiles that could go beyond a certain limitation.'

The secretary's comments come amid reports of heavy military losses for Iran, though Tehran has publicly vowed to continue fighting 'until complete victory.' Privately, Rubio noted, Iranian officials have shown signs of cooperation in discussions, contrasting with their defiant public stance. He stressed that President Trump would not tolerate prolonged negotiations as a stalling tactic, unlike what he described as the approach under the previous Biden administration.

'What President Trump is not going to allow is he's not going to allow fake negotiations to be used as a delay tactic, to buy more time, to buy themselves space,' Rubio explained.

Background on the escalation traces back to heightened tensions over Iran's nuclear ambitions and regional proxy activities. The Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a Washington-based think tank, has mapped Iran's missile ranges, illustrating capabilities that could potentially extend to Europe and beyond. Rubio highlighted that Iranian leaders view their mission in apocalyptic terms, with a deep-seated desire for nuclear weapons. 'This is a regime led by people who believe that it is their calling and their purpose in life is to usher in the end of the world,' he said. 'These people want nuclear weapons.'

President Trump has indicated that the conflict might conclude in just a few more weeks, aligning with Rubio's assessment. 'We can see the finish line. It's not today, it's not tomorrow, but it is coming,' Rubio affirmed. Reports suggest Iranian leadership is in flux, with unconfirmed accounts of internal instability. Adding to the diplomatic landscape, Pakistan announced on Sunday that it would host talks between the United States and Iran, potentially offering a venue for de-escalation.

However, Rubio warned that failure to reach a deal would not halt U.S. military efforts. 'We're not going to allow… the failure of talks to impede our ability to defend this country and to protect this country from a real threat,' he declared. This stance underscores the administration's commitment to deterrence, with Trump portraying the strategy as a lesson in resolve to adversaries.

The Iran conflict has also strained relations within the NATO alliance. Rubio indicated that the U.S. might reassess its involvement once the situation resolves, questioning the mutual benefits of the partnership. Several NATO countries have signaled reluctance to get involved, with Trump noting that most have indicated they do not want to participate. 'We are going to reexamine whether or not this alliance, that has served this country well for a while, is still serving that purpose or has it now become a one-way street, where America is simply in a position to defend Europe,' Rubio said. 'But when we need the help of our allies, they're going to deny us basing rights.'

This potential reevaluation echoes broader debates about burden-sharing in international alliances, particularly in light of the U.S.-led campaign against Iran. Rubio's recent attendance at the Munich Security Conference on February 13, 2026, where he met with counterparts including China's foreign minister, highlights ongoing multilateral efforts amid the crisis.

Domestically, the administration has tied the Iran strategy to other foreign policy priorities. Rubio briefly touched on the situations in Venezuela and Cuba during the interview, though details were sparse. He portrayed the strikes on Iran as the 'most consequential decision' of Trump's presidency, a view echoed by Senator Ted Cruz in related commentary.

As the conflict progresses, public attention is turning to President Trump's scheduled address to the nation on Wednesday at 9 p.m. ET. The speech is expected to provide an update on the state of the U.S.-Iran confrontation, possibly including new developments from ongoing operations or diplomatic channels.

Analysts have noted the rapid pace of Operation Epic Fury, which has involved targeted strikes aimed at degrading Iran's missile and nuclear infrastructure. While U.S. officials report significant progress, Iranian state media continues to broadcast messages of resilience, claiming minimal impact from the attacks. Independent verification of these claims remains limited, with international observers calling for greater transparency.

The broader implications of the conflict extend to global energy markets and regional stability. Iran's threats to disrupt shipping in the Strait of Hormuz have raised concerns about oil prices, though no major disruptions have materialized to date. Meanwhile, allies like Israel have expressed support for the U.S. actions, viewing them as a necessary check on Iranian influence in the Middle East.

Looking ahead, the success of any negotiated settlement will depend on Iran's willingness to curb its missile program and nuclear pursuits. Rubio's warnings about Tehran's ideological drivers suggest that the administration anticipates a long-term commitment to monitoring compliance. As talks potentially unfold in Pakistan, the international community watches closely, aware that the outcome could reshape alliances and security dynamics for years to come.

In a related development, the White House released images from the initial strikes, showing precision operations against key facilities. These visuals, shared via Trump's X account, aim to demonstrate the operation's effectiveness while bolstering domestic support. Critics, including some Democratic lawmakers, have questioned the risks of escalation, but administration officials maintain that the path to resolution is clearer than ever.

Share: