The Appleton Times

Truth. Honesty. Innovation.

Entertainment

‘Reality Check: Inside ANTM’ Directors Say Doc Would Have Happened “Regardless” Of Tyra Banks’ Participation

By Rachel Martinez

about 20 hours ago

Share:
‘Reality Check: Inside ANTM’ Directors Say Doc Would Have Happened “Regardless” Of Tyra Banks’ Participation

Directors of the Netflix docuseries 'Reality Check: Inside America’s Next Top Model' affirm the project would have proceeded without Tyra Banks' participation, adding depth through her interviews despite her limited editorial control. The series explores ANTM's controversies, sparking online debate over Banks' accountability while highlighting the show's complex legacy.

APPLETON, Wis. — The Netflix docuseries Reality Check: Inside America’s Next Top Model has sparked intense online debate since its debut on Monday, February 16, 2026, particularly surrounding host Tyra Banks' role in the production. Directors Daniel Sivan and Mor Loushy emphasized in recent interviews that the project exploring the behind-the-scenes controversies of the long-running reality competition would have proceeded regardless of Banks' involvement.

The series delves into the highs and lows of America’s Next Top Model (ANTM), which aired for 24 cycles from 2003 to 2015 across UPN, The CW, and VH1. Created and hosted by Banks, the show launched the careers of several models while drawing criticism for its handling of sensitive issues, including body image pressures and racial insensitivities. Now, with Reality Check streaming on Netflix, former contestants, judges, and producers have opened up about these moments, but Banks' participation has become a focal point of contention.

Speaking to TheWrap, co-director Mor Loushy explained the independent nature of the documentary's development. “This documentary was happening, regardless if she was giving an interview or not, and she decided she did want to share her side of the story,” Loushy said. He added, “I’m very happy that she did, because it gave the opportunity to really go deep into the debates, into the start of the idea, and not by a third person but from Tyra, herself, to really hear the journey that she’s been through.”

The docuseries covers several pivotal controversies from ANTM's history. One notable incident highlighted is the onscreen sexual assault experienced by contestant Shandi Sullivan during Cycle 2 in 2004, where she was involved in a staged scenario that many viewed as exploitative. The series also addresses multiple instances of blackface, such as in photo shoots that required contestants to darken their skin, and Banks' infamous elimination critique of Tiffany Richardson in Cycle 4, where she declared, “We were all rooting for you,” a phrase that has since become a cultural shorthand for dashed expectations.

Co-director Daniel Sivan pointed out that Banks was forthcoming on most topics but drew a line at discussing her past friendship with longtime judge Jay Manuel. “The fact that she said, ‘I don’t want to talk about it’ … is a powerful answer. It wasn’t dodging the bullet. It was saying, ‘this is still painful,'” Sivan told TheWrap. Manuel, who served as a creative director on the show for 18 cycles, has not publicly commented on their relationship in recent years, leaving the docuseries to capture the unspoken tension.

According to reports from TheWrap, Banks exercised no editorial control over Reality Check and was not shown the final cut until its Netflix premiere. This lack of influence has fueled discussions about whether the series serves as a platform for Banks to rehabilitate her image from the show's more problematic eras. Banks, who stepped away from ANTM after Cycle 23 in 2015 to focus on other ventures like her talk show and modeling agency, has hinted at a potential return. In a recent tease, she said of a possible Cycle 25, “My work is not done,” suggesting ongoing attachment to the franchise.

Online reactions to Banks' segments in the docuseries have been sharply divided. While former models and judges like Nigel Barker and Twiggy have been praised for their candid reflections, many viewers expressed frustration with Banks' responses. One X user, posting under the handle @Lalaaaa on February 16, 2026, questioned the project's intent: “Was the #RealityCheck ANTM documentary meant to help Tyra Banks clear her name? Cause idk if it did,” accompanied by a clip from the series.

Another commenter on Threads echoed similar sentiments, writing, “Tyra Banks should’ve passed on this documentary. She can barely even PRETEND to give two ounces of a f*ck. My God.” A third post shared a still from Banks' confessional interview, captioned, “If I send you this, just know I’m not apologizing for sh*t,” highlighting perceptions that she fell short of issuing direct apologies for the show's controversies.

The docuseries arrives at a time when reality TV reckonings are increasingly common, with shows like Survivor and The Real World facing similar scrutiny over past behaviors. ANTM's legacy is particularly complex; it empowered diverse contestants in an industry often criticized for its narrow standards, yet episodes featuring weight-shaming, cultural insensitivity, and emotional manipulation have aged poorly in the post-#MeToo era. For instance, Cycle 8's all-international cast included makeovers that some deemed stereotypical, a topic touched upon in Reality Check through interviews with participants like Heather Kuzmich, who was the first contestant with Asperger's syndrome.

Sivan and Loushy, Israeli filmmakers known for documentaries like Sex Appeal and Edge of the Axe, approached the project with a focus on archival footage and firsthand accounts. They interviewed over 30 alumni, including winners like Adrianne Curry from Cycle 1 and Eva Pigford from Cycle 3, who discussed the transformative yet traumatic aspects of the competition. The directors noted that Banks' decision to participate came late in production, after initial outreach, allowing the series to balance her perspective with others' without her shaping the narrative.

Critics and viewers alike have commended the docuseries for its even-handed portrayal. A trailer released by Netflix in early February 2026 previewed emotional testimonies, setting the stage for the full four-part release. The platform's marketing emphasized the “unfiltered look” at ANTM's impact, which grossed high ratings during its peak but also faced backlash from advocacy groups like the National Eating Disorders Association for promoting unhealthy ideals.

Banks, now 52, has built a multifaceted career beyond ANTM, including roles in film, philanthropy through her TZONE foundation, and as a judge on Dancing with the Stars. Her interview in Reality Check touches on the show's origins in 2003, when she pitched it to UPN executives as a way to democratize modeling. Yet, as one former producer anonymously told the directors, the format's drama-driven structure often prioritized spectacle over support, leading to moments like the 2006 makeout challenge in Cycle 7 that blurred lines of consent.

The broader implications of Reality Check extend to the reality TV industry's evolution. With streaming services like Netflix investing in retrospective content, such as the Love Is Blind reunion specials, there's growing demand for accountability. ANTM alumni have used the docuseries to advocate for better protections; for example, Cycle 10's Lauren Utter, who dealt with anxiety on the show, called for mental health resources in future productions during her interview.

Looking ahead, Banks' teased return to ANTM raises questions about how the franchise might adapt. VH1, which aired the final cycles, has not confirmed revival plans, but industry insiders report discussions amid the docuseries' buzz. Sivan expressed optimism that the project could inspire positive change, stating in TheWrap that hearing Banks' unvarnished story “humanizes the icon behind the empire.”

As Reality Check climbs Netflix's charts, it underscores ANTM's enduring cultural footprint—from memes to mentorship—while prompting reflection on fame's double-edged sword. Whether Banks' involvement ultimately clears her name or amplifies unresolved tensions remains a point of viewer debate, but the directors maintain the documentary's core mission was always to illuminate the truth of the show's storied run.

Share: